As you might expect, CSA is a heavyhanded movie.
Analee Lewitz writes at Alternet in a 2006 review:
I love a good alternate history yarn for the same reason I love science fiction. Both genres analyze present-day trends by projecting them into another reality. That other reality might be the future or simply a transformed version of the present.
In the United States, there are two incredibly popular alternate history scenarios: 1. What if the South had won the Civil War? and 2. What if Germany had won World War II? “C.S.A: The Confederate States of America”, a fake British documentary made by Kansas filmmaker Kevin Willmott, answers both questions.
After its limited release in the theaters two years ago, the movie achieved cult status in DVD form, which is really its natural medium. It's fascinating to watch “CSA” on a television set because the movie is meant to resemble a snippet from a TV station, complete with freaky commercials and news breaks, that is airing a "controversial" British documentary about the history of the CSA.
Blending dark humor with painstakingly researched historical revisionism, Willmott begins the movie with a fake commercial for insurance. The clip looks exactly like something you might see on ABC, including the fact that everyone in it is white. Then the announcer says, "Our insurance protects you and your property," and the camera pans over to a smiling black boy who is clipping a hedge. This is a present day in which slavery still exists.
The British documentary reveals how this came to pass. After the South wins the Civil War with the help of France and England, the president heals the rift between North and South by offering Northerners slaves to help reconstruct the bombed-out cities of New York and Boston. Deposed president Lincoln flees to Canada, followed by 20,000 abolitionists including Fredrick Douglass and Henry David Thoreau.
The framing device is that we're watching 95 minutes of uncut TV from this universe, complete with station checks and commercials. A title card at the end of the movie says that many of the products advertised are real, in our universe: Darkie toothpaste, the Coon Chicken Inn, and a brand of tobacco with a name so racist and vile I'm not even going to use it here. A couple of the products were available until the 1950s.
I couldn't tell you whether I liked the movie. I watched the whole thing. I wanted to see what happened next, that is, how the alternate American history played out. I don't really feel like I learned anything: I already knew that racism existed throughout American history, and continues today. And I'm uncomfortable with political discussion that isolates racism, as this movie does, and fails to portray it in the complete matrix of American ethnic, religious, economic, and class prejudices--and also great opportunity for all people. Our African-American president is subject to quite a bit of racism--but he's still President.
It's a low-budget movie, and it shows. In particular, bits that are supposedly excerpts from movies made by D.W. Griffith in 1915, and Hollywood in the 1940s, look cheap and fake. D.W. and the Hollywood studio system made better movies than that.
Overall, a nice attempt, but I prefer Harry Turtledove's novel, Guns of the South, which covers essentially the same ground.
Recent Comments